We're not supposed to talk about Hitler or compare anyone who isn't actually killing Jews to him, but that's how propaganda works. Propagandists censor from within by connecting with our subconscious.
Artwork and memes and music have the power to implant a strict message that would usually require hours of peer pressure to condition.
Logical Fallacy called “Playing the Hitler Card"
Playing the Hitler card demonizes opponents in debate by associating them with evil, and almost always derails the discussion. People naturally resent being associated with Nazism, and are usually angered. In this way, playing the card can be an effective distraction in a debate, causing the opponent to lose track of the argument. However, when people become convinced by guilt by association arguments that their political opponents are not just mistaken, but are as evil as Nazis, reasoned debate can give way to violence. So, the Hitler card is more than just a dirty trick in debate, it is often "fighting words" and may lead to the argumentum ad baculum.
Nobody and nothing compares to the holocaust and to suggest otherwise, or to point out how the Nazis also killed disabled white Germans (including children), “unclean gypsies”, and the entire “undesirable population" is to set yourself up to look like an insensitive jerk.
To say that you see a pattern in current global politics that is similar to the superiority mindset of the Aryan race who attempted to take over the world in order to improve the human species and make the planet a safer place to live is, as Cheryl Hines said when her husband Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to compare current tryannical technocrats to the Nazi regime, well it's just “absolutely reprehensible”.
Logical Fallacy called Godwin's Law
Godwin's law, short for Godwin's law (or rule) of Nazi analogies,[1][2] is an Internet adage asserting that as an online discussion grows longer (regardless of topic or scope), the probability of a comparison to Nazis or Adolf Hitler approaches 1.[2][3]
Promulgated by the American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990,[2] Godwin's law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions.[4] He stated that he introduced Godwin's law in 1990 as an experiment in memetics.[2] Later it was applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric[5][6] where reductio ad Hitlerum occurs.
How can we learn from our collective human mistakes if we're forbidden to talk about them? Dysfunctional family patterns always use forms of censorship to suppress dissent. To an abuser, “having your own mind” is the worst kind of dissent because they need to feel that they can control all of you.
I think that's the point though, to keep secrets between children and tgeir parents to drive a rift between them in order to make them more impressionable and easily influenced. Strong families protect and care for each other so way harder to use and abuse.
At the root of all family and political dysfunction are power struggles to acquire social superiority
The Nazi Youth were viewed as more compliant than their parents therefore better genetically enhanced like well bred horses. Way more accepting of the new Nazi ideology that was Aryan superiority, the Nazi Youth had their serotonin switched on high by those who could bless them into mafia made untouchables or like the pedo priest's favorite pupil. They were taught to believe that it was their destiny to make the world a better place.
Eugenics was accepted as unquestionable Science. It was classic “survival of the fittest" biology, a fact of life, an official truth that should not be questioned, that entitled the Germans to selectively kill and breed. They were “woke” to the Science of evolution. They proudly took on their civic duty to cleanse the world of evil. Does this kind of pride sound familiar?
Nazi Youth= Elite Soldiers
Kids that are woke today reap similiar rewards thay the Nazi Youth but aren't expected to kill. They're just expected to be ok with letting the unvaxxed die. Nazi Youth leaders were praised for such as having a strong sense of identity and integrity and for being wiser and stronger. Because they were standing up for what was right (or what they're told is right by people in power) by putting duty before pleasure, they were transhumans or some kind of robotic task force.
Alright, so there are many differences between the Nazi Youth and the Neo Woke but they both undoubtedly believed that they were on the right side of history whether they marched to the beat of the regime or to a different drummer.
Both have a twisted intolerance toward the older generations. Check out this teacher explaining how she establishes a trust bond with her students by keeping secrets from the parents.
I doubt that this teacher is consciously aware of what she's doing which is brainwashing kids to adopt a state approved identity to feel that they are a part of a collective community who values them more than their elders. She seems to genuinely feel that she and her students are morally and intellectually superior to old-fashioned-racist-misogynistic-mom-and-dad.
“If the older generation can not get accustomed to us, we shall take their children away from them and rear them as needful to the Fatherland.”
Adolf Hitler, June 1933
The kids in “1984” follow similiar patterns of the Neo Woke and Nazi Youth. Check out my podcast where I read and compare 1984 propaganda and education programs to modern policies.